Why local food matters

Research, guides, and stories on farming, food systems, and the people growing our food in New England, written so you can use them, not just read them.

This New York study measures what happens when schools shift part of their food budget to local farms. It finds that every dollar schools spend on local food generates additional economic activity in the state through farm sales, wages, and local business purchases. It also notes that these benefits are largest when local purchases replace food sourced from out-of-state suppliers. In other words, the gains come when you actually displace big, distant vendors instead of rearranging spending between locals.

Learn more

This paper builds a method for tracking how much money schools spend on local food and how that money flows back to nearby farmers and businesses. Case studies show that when schools commit to buying from local farms, it can become a stable, long-term market that supports farm income, encourages new hiring, and keeps public dollars moving through local communities instead of leaving the state through large national distributors.

Learn more

This case study compared small farms that sell directly to customers (farm stands, farmers’ markets, etc.) with more traditional farms selling into big wholesale channels. Every $100 spent with the direct-marketing farms created $186 of total local economic activity, while the same $100 spent with conventional farms created $142. On top of that, local direct-marketing farms created about 29 local jobs per $1 million in sales, compared with only 10.5 jobs for the larger wholesale operations. Translation: buying from smaller local farms puts more money and more jobs into the surrounding community than buying from the big, anonymous supply chain.

Learn more

Washington State pulls together multiple studies on “farm-to-school” programs and reports a simple, striking number: every $1 invested in farm-to-school can generate up to $2.16 in local economic activity. That’s money going to farmers, truck drivers, packers, and main-street businesses instead of large, centralized food service companies. It’s a clear example of how public food dollars can be turned into a local economic engine instead of a pipeline to big national suppliers.

Learn more

This review tracks fertilizer and manure from large-scale U.S. industrial farms into rivers, lakes, and the atmosphere. It shows how excess nitrogen and phosphorus from feedlots and vast corn/soy fields fuel toxic algal blooms, dead zones, and big chunks of our agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. In plain terms: concentrated factory farming is one of the main reasons so many lakes and coasts are turning green and lifeless.

Learn more

NRDC pulls together EPA and scientific data showing how large-scale industrial farms are major sources of water pollution, greenhouse gases, and soil degradation in the U.S. It highlights fertilizer runoff driving harmful algal blooms, manure lagoons leaking into groundwater, and air emissions from giant livestock operations. It’s a concise, accessible summary of why “Big Ag” is such a problem for land, air, and water.

Learn more

This meta-analysis combined data from 98 studies worldwide. It shows that farms with crop diversity, flower strips, hedgerows, and mixed habitats support far more beneficial insects (pollinators, predators) than simplified industrial fields. The kind of mixed, messy landscapes you see at many small farms literally keep the living “infrastructure” of the ecosystem alive.

Learn more

Here, scientists built a huge database of 5,000+ comparisons of diversified vs. conventional farming. They show that biodiversity almost always improves when farms diversify, and yields often hold steady. In other words, you don’t have to choose between wildlife and food. The right kind of diversified, often smaller-scale farming supports both.

Learn more

This systematic review looks across dozens of studies on large animal feeding operations (CAFOs). It finds consistent links between these factory farms and air pollution, water contamination, antibiotic resistance, and other hazards for nearby communities and ecosystems. It’s basically the scientific receipt for why “cheap” industrial meat carries a heavy environmental price.

Learn more

A study of New York City community gardens found they could soak up millions of gallons of stormwater each year that would otherwise flood streets and overload sewers. The 2024 policy brief summarizing this work makes the point clearly: small, soil-based food plots in cities act like sponges and filters, making extreme rain and pollution less damaging.

Learn more

After a seven-month school gardening program, children could identify far more vegetables and reported liking them more, with the effect still holding a full year later. Growing a vegetable yourself, even as a kid, seems to change whether you're willing to eat it.

Learn more

Comparing two genetically similar farming communities, this study found essentially no asthma among Amish children, who live in close daily contact with farm animals, versus 20% among Hutterite children, whose farms are large and industrialized. The dust from a small, old-fashioned barn appears to train young immune systems in a way sterile, large-scale operations don't.

Learn more

Tracking over 11,000 UK adults, this study found people who cooked at home more than five times a week ate significantly more fruits and vegetables, and carried less body fat, than those who cooked three times or less. Buying real ingredients only pays off if they actually make it into a pan. This is the data behind that assumption.

Learn more

In this Stanford trial, adults who added foods like yogurt, kefir, and fermented vegetables to their diet for ten weeks saw their gut microbial diversity increase and markers of inflammation drop, effects a high-fiber diet alone didn't produce in the same short window. The ferment aisle at a farm stand isn't just a flavor choice.

Learn more

Even under ideal refrigeration, packaged spinach lost nearly half its folate within eight days, and losses accelerated sharply at warmer, more realistic transport temperatures. The nutrients on a nutrition label assume the vegetable was tested the day it was picked. The longer produce sits in a truck or on a shelf, the less of that label is actually still true.

Learn more

Among low-income families in subsidized CSA programs, 81.6% of adults and 82.9% of children met government vegetable-intake guidelines, compared to roughly 9-10% of Americans overall. Getting a weekly box of real produce, whether or not you chose it, seems to work better than telling people to eat their vegetables.

Learn more

Get the short version

A short, occasional email about what's inseason, new farms added to Farmstands, and the people behind the food. Free. Easyto unsubscribe.

Thanks for subscribing to our newsletter
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.