Research, guides, and stories on farming, food systems, and the people growing our food in New England, written so you can use them, not just read them.
This New York study measures what happens when schools shift part of their food budget to local farms. It finds that every dollar schools spend on local food generates additional economic activity in the state through farm sales, wages, and local business purchases. It also notes that these benefits are largest when local purchases replace food sourced from out-of-state suppliers. In other words, the gains come when you actually displace big, distant vendors instead of rearranging spending between locals.
This paper builds a method for tracking how much money schools spend on local food and how that money flows back to nearby farmers and businesses. Case studies show that when schools commit to buying from local farms, it can become a stable, long-term market that supports farm income, encourages new hiring, and keeps public dollars moving through local communities instead of leaving the state through large national distributors.
This case study compared small farms that sell directly to customers (farm stands, farmers’ markets, etc.) with more traditional farms selling into big wholesale channels. Every $100 spent with the direct-marketing farms created $186 of total local economic activity, while the same $100 spent with conventional farms created $142. On top of that, local direct-marketing farms created about 29 local jobs per $1 million in sales, compared with only 10.5 jobs for the larger wholesale operations. Translation: buying from smaller local farms puts more money and more jobs into the surrounding community than buying from the big, anonymous supply chain.
Washington State pulls together multiple studies on “farm-to-school” programs and reports a simple, striking number: every $1 invested in farm-to-school can generate up to $2.16 in local economic activity. That’s money going to farmers, truck drivers, packers, and main-street businesses instead of large, centralized food service companies. It’s a clear example of how public food dollars can be turned into a local economic engine instead of a pipeline to big national suppliers.
Modeling a Midwest watershed, this study found that skipping the plow (no-till farming) cut soil erosion and sediment runoff by more than 70%. Notably, targeting just the most erosion-prone 40% of fields got nearly the same result as converting everything. Less tilling means less topsoil ending up in the nearest river instead of growing next year's food.
Pooling results across dozens of trials, this analysis found that fields treated with manure instead of synthetic fertilizer alone stored 30% more organic carbon in the soil. Healthier soil holds water better, erodes less, and quietly banks carbon that would otherwise be in the air. It's a side effect of doing things the older way.
New England has already lost 80% of its farmland over the last 60 years, and this analysis projects at least 267,000 more acres gone by 2040 if current development trends hold. Every acre a small farm loses to a subdivision doesn't come back. Supporting the farms still standing is part of keeping the region's food-growing capacity from shrinking further.
Analyzing over 14,000 fields across France, this study found that farms rotating a wider variety of crops year to year used meaningfully less pesticide, cutting use by 19-23% depending on the crop. Diversity isn't just good for the plate. It's a working alternative to spraying more.
Tracking 62 wild bee species against pesticide-treated cropland over 18 years, this study found neonicotinoid use tracked with real, large-scale population declines, hitting species that feed on treated crops three times harder than others. It's a rare case of a chemical's harm showing up not in a lab, but in national wildlife data.
Mixing trees into pastureland (silvopasture) could sequester up to 25.6 million tons of CO2 a year across the eastern U.S. if farmers adopted it widely, cutting the carbon footprint of beef by as much as 11%. Some tree species pay farmers back in under a decade, too. It's one of the rare climate fixes that also pencils out financially.
In Wisconsin elementary schools that started sourcing cafeteria produce locally, the kids eating the least fruits and vegetables to begin with saw their intake jump the most, with very-low consumers increasing fruit intake 135%. Put real produce in front of kids regularly, and the ones who need it most actually eat it.
This review found grass-finished beef consistently carries more omega-3s, more CLA (a fat linked to better body composition), and higher levels of protective antioxidants like vitamin E than grain-fed beef, with a fatty acid profile that leans more heart-friendly. Same cut of meat, different pasture, measurably different nutrition.
Across multiple large cohorts, people who ate more whole grains had lower risk of heart disease, total cancer, and dying from any cause. Swapping refined grains for whole-grain bread, oats, brown rice, etc. was consistently linked with longer, healthier lives.
Looking at long-term eating patterns, this paper found that fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and nuts together were linked to lower cardiovascular mortality. It’s basically a data-driven endorsement of a plate built around simple, whole ingredients.
Reviewing dozens of studies, this umbrella review links high intakes of free sugars (from soft drinks, desserts, etc.) with higher risk of weight gain, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and dental problems. The big message: most people need to cut back on refined, added sugars and focus sweetness into small amounts of higher-quality sources like fruit and (in moderation) things like honey.
Pooling 22 prospective studies, this meta-analysis showed that people in the highest ultra-processed food group had 17% higher risk of cardiovascular disease and 23% higher risk of coronary heart disease than those who ate the least. Sugary drinks and processed meats were especially bad, while some less-junk versions (like simple breads or yogurts) were less harmful.
A short, occasional email about what's inseason, new farms added to Farmstands, and the people behind the food. Free. Easyto unsubscribe.
