Research, guides, and stories on farming, food systems, and the people growing our food in New England, written so you can use them, not just read them.
Pooling 86 estimates from 35 separate studies, this analysis found shoppers really do pay more for local food, typically an extra $1.70 to $2.08 per pound, with the premium even higher for local meat and dairy than for produce. The "local costs more" line isn't a myth. It's also apparently a price people choose to pay.
This Harvard Forest report puts a number on something that's easy to hand-wave: every $1 of state money spent conserving New England's forests and farmland returns $4 to $11 in natural goods and services, from clean water to $570 million a year in avoided health care costs from cleaner air. Protecting the land isn't charity. It's one of the better investments the region makes.
When supply chains buckled in 2020, Michigan farmers markets didn't. Over 90% of vendors interviewed reported higher revenue that year than the one before, as shoppers who wanted to know exactly where their food came from turned to the people actually growing it. It's a real-world stress test of what a short supply chain is for.
Modeling agritourism spending across Tennessee, this study found every $1 spent at a farm generates $1.82 in total economic output for the state, as that money moves on to food service, recreation, and other local businesses. Buying a pumpkin at the farm instead of the grocery store keeps paying the neighborhood back long after you've left.
USDA's own farm census shows agritourism income hit $1.26 billion in 2022, up double digits from five years earlier, with well over half of U.S. counties reporting some agritourism revenue. Farm tours, u-pick days, and on-site sales aren't a side gimmick. They're becoming a real second income stream keeping small farms afloat.
This national analysis of CSA farms found they tend to be small, run by younger or first-generation farmers, and often working rented land without the bargaining power of bigger operations. For exactly those farms, selling directly to members provides steadier income and a way in that conventional wholesale channels don't offer.
EU-funded research comparing multiple real-world short chains (farm shops, CSAs, box schemes, local fish clubs) with conventional supermarket chains. Case studies show that well-run SFSCs can cut transport emissions, packaging waste, and food loss, while improving freshness and reconnecting consumers with producers.
Researchers here looked at farmers selling through farmers’ markets, CSAs, and other short chains. They show that these systems can cut packaging, reduce waste, and encourage more diverse, eco-friendly farming practices. For a shopper, buying from short chains tends to mean less hidden pollution behind the scenes.
This big review looks at 20 years of work on local food systems. It finds that local farms are particularly good at protecting farmland from sprawl, maintaining landscape diversity, and building climate resilience, even if transport emissions are only part of the story. For the environment, the big gains come from how local farms manage land, not just how far the food travels.
This LCA compares 428 short and long food supply chains across six European countries. On average, long chains can be more eco-efficient per kg because of highly optimized logistics, but there’s huge variation: some short chains perform very well. The key takeaway: “local” isn’t magically greener; when short chains are well-organized (grouped deliveries, minimal waste, efficient storage) they can match or beat industrial chains on energy use and emissions.
This paper shows how the expansion and intensification of agriculture over the last 50 years has driven massive biodiversity loss worldwide. High-input, monoculture systems are a major reason so many species are sliding toward extinction. When you choose food from lower-input, more local producers, you’re pushing against that trend.
Working across European farms, this study shows that as agriculture becomes more intensive and uniform, both the number of species and the variety of “jobs” they perform in the ecosystem collapse. In practice, that means fewer pollinators, fewer natural pest-eaters, and more fragile ecosystems – the exact opposite of what you see on well-managed mixed farms.
In this huge 21-country cohort, higher intake of processed meat clearly tracked with more heart disease and higher mortality. Unprocessed red meat and poultry, at typical intakes, were not significantly linked with major cardiovascular events or death. The risk signal shows up when meat is heavily processed and eaten in big amounts, not when someone has moderate portions of unprocessed meat alongside plenty of real food.
This review shows that real maple syrup is more than flavored sugar water. It carries phenolic compounds with antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activity. It’s still a sweetener, but compared with stripped-down white sugar, it brings along protective plant compounds instead of empty energy.
Here, people at risk for diabetes ate a government-approved “healthy” diet, then switched to a version with an extra ~150 g/day of lean, unprocessed beef swapped in for mostly refined starches. The beef version didn’t worsen insulin sensitivity, blood sugar, or most cholesterol markers, and actually shifted LDL particles toward a “fluffier,” less risky profile. In other words, replacing some white carbs with lean beef inside a whole-food pattern didn’t break their metabolism.
This review of 18 controlled trials found that real honey, in realistic amounts, modestly improved several markers like fasting blood sugar, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides compared with other sweeteners. It’s still sugar, so you don’t chug it. As a sweetener, though, honey behaves more like a functional food than empty calories.
This paper digs into how different doses and types of honey affect metabolic health markers. It supports the idea that small to moderate amounts of real honey can fit into a heart-conscious diet better than refined sugars, likely thanks to its unique mix of antioxidants and bioactive compounds.
Following over 100,000 adults for decades, this study found that about 5 servings of fruits and vegetables per day (2 fruits, 3 veg) was linked to the lowest risk of death. More than that didn’t seem to add much, less than that clearly hurt. It’s a very straightforward “5-a-day really matters” result.
A short, occasional email about what's inseason, new farms added to Farmstands, and the people behind the food. Free. Easyto unsubscribe.
