Why local food matters

Research, guides, and stories on farming, food systems, and the people growing our food in New England, written so you can use them, not just read them.

Pooling 86 estimates from 35 separate studies, this analysis found shoppers really do pay more for local food, typically an extra $1.70 to $2.08 per pound, with the premium even higher for local meat and dairy than for produce. The "local costs more" line isn't a myth. It's also apparently a price people choose to pay.

Learn more

This Harvard Forest report puts a number on something that's easy to hand-wave: every $1 of state money spent conserving New England's forests and farmland returns $4 to $11 in natural goods and services, from clean water to $570 million a year in avoided health care costs from cleaner air. Protecting the land isn't charity. It's one of the better investments the region makes.

Learn more

When supply chains buckled in 2020, Michigan farmers markets didn't. Over 90% of vendors interviewed reported higher revenue that year than the one before, as shoppers who wanted to know exactly where their food came from turned to the people actually growing it. It's a real-world stress test of what a short supply chain is for.

Learn more

Modeling agritourism spending across Tennessee, this study found every $1 spent at a farm generates $1.82 in total economic output for the state, as that money moves on to food service, recreation, and other local businesses. Buying a pumpkin at the farm instead of the grocery store keeps paying the neighborhood back long after you've left.

Learn more

USDA's own farm census shows agritourism income hit $1.26 billion in 2022, up double digits from five years earlier, with well over half of U.S. counties reporting some agritourism revenue. Farm tours, u-pick days, and on-site sales aren't a side gimmick. They're becoming a real second income stream keeping small farms afloat.

Learn more

This national analysis of CSA farms found they tend to be small, run by younger or first-generation farmers, and often working rented land without the bargaining power of bigger operations. For exactly those farms, selling directly to members provides steadier income and a way in that conventional wholesale channels don't offer.

Learn more

This review tracks fertilizer and manure from large-scale U.S. industrial farms into rivers, lakes, and the atmosphere. It shows how excess nitrogen and phosphorus from feedlots and vast corn/soy fields fuel toxic algal blooms, dead zones, and big chunks of our agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. In plain terms: concentrated factory farming is one of the main reasons so many lakes and coasts are turning green and lifeless.

Learn more

NRDC pulls together EPA and scientific data showing how large-scale industrial farms are major sources of water pollution, greenhouse gases, and soil degradation in the U.S. It highlights fertilizer runoff driving harmful algal blooms, manure lagoons leaking into groundwater, and air emissions from giant livestock operations. It’s a concise, accessible summary of why “Big Ag” is such a problem for land, air, and water.

Learn more

This meta-analysis combined data from 98 studies worldwide. It shows that farms with crop diversity, flower strips, hedgerows, and mixed habitats support far more beneficial insects (pollinators, predators) than simplified industrial fields. The kind of mixed, messy landscapes you see at many small farms literally keep the living “infrastructure” of the ecosystem alive.

Learn more

Here, scientists built a huge database of 5,000+ comparisons of diversified vs. conventional farming. They show that biodiversity almost always improves when farms diversify, and yields often hold steady. In other words, you don’t have to choose between wildlife and food. The right kind of diversified, often smaller-scale farming supports both.

Learn more

This systematic review looks across dozens of studies on large animal feeding operations (CAFOs). It finds consistent links between these factory farms and air pollution, water contamination, antibiotic resistance, and other hazards for nearby communities and ecosystems. It’s basically the scientific receipt for why “cheap” industrial meat carries a heavy environmental price.

Learn more

A study of New York City community gardens found they could soak up millions of gallons of stormwater each year that would otherwise flood streets and overload sewers. The 2024 policy brief summarizing this work makes the point clearly: small, soil-based food plots in cities act like sponges and filters, making extreme rain and pollution less damaging.

Learn more

The World Health Organization reviewed global data and estimates that millions of deaths per year are linked to people not eating enough fruits and vegetables. Their conclusion is simple: eating more whole plant foods cuts the risk of heart disease, stroke, and other chronic illnesses.

Learn more

Reviewing multiple cohort studies, this paper found that people who regularly eat fruits (especially) and vegetables have a lower risk of developing depression. It’s another line of evidence that “real food” supports more than your heart. It also supports your mood and mental health.

Learn more

Pooling data from 95 large cohort studies, this paper found that people who ate more fruits and vegetables had lower risk of heart disease, cancer, and dying early. The benefits climbed up to about 800 grams a day (around 8–10 servings), which is basically “pile your plate with plants.”

Learn more

This study followed adults over time and showed that higher fruit and vegetable intake was associated with fewer depressive symptoms later on, even after accounting for family factors. It strengthens the idea that everyday food choices help shape how you feel emotionally.

Learn more

In patients who already had cardiovascular disease, those eating around two servings of fish per week had lower risk of major cardiovascular events and death compared to those eating less. For people with damaged arteries, simple, regular fish intake acted like a steady insurance policy.

Learn more

This meta-analysis showed that, for most people, eating eggs in typical amounts wasn’t associated with a meaningful increase in cardiovascular risk. Eggs did nudge both LDL and HDL up, but the balance (LDL:HDL ratio) hardly changed, which likely explains why events didn’t spike. Moderation and overall diet quality still matter, but eggs aren’t the ticking time bomb they were once sold as.

Learn more

Get the short version

A short, occasional email about what's inseason, new farms added to Farmstands, and the people behind the food. Free. Easyto unsubscribe.

Thanks for subscribing to our newsletter
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.